Stage 1 · Recognising the modes
Learning to notice which state you are in while you are in it. Sounds slight; it is the foundation. 'That is the punitive parent, not a fact about me' is the whole basis of what follows.
Schema therapy has an evidence base for BPD and takes a different route from the skills approaches — it works on long-standing patterns formed early and on the states a person switches between. The book names it in chapter 20 and does not teach it.

Schema therapy describes BPD as rapid switching between states rather than as a set of symptoms. Most people recognise all four immediately.
The state underneath most of it: frightened, alone, convinced of being unloved and about to be left. Small, young, and desperate. This is what most of the other modes exist to protect.
Rage at needs going unmet. Reads as disproportionate from outside because it is not calibrated to the current event — it carries everything that came before it.
The internal voice that says you are bad, deserve nothing, and should be punished. Usually an internalisation of a real voice from earlier. This mode is the source of most self-harm and most of the shame.
Numbness, withdrawal, dissociation. Shuts everything down when the rest becomes unbearable. Frequently mistaken for being fine, including by the person in it.
Broadly in this order, though modes recur throughout rather than being worked through once.
Learning to notice which state you are in while you are in it. Sounds slight; it is the foundation. 'That is the punitive parent, not a fact about me' is the whole basis of what follows.
The distinctive element and the one people are most sceptical of. Within professional boundaries, the therapist deliberately provides some of what was missing — consistency, warmth, being taken seriously. Not a substitute parent; a corrective experience of one specific kind.
Actively challenging that voice, often through experiential techniques — chair work, imagery rescripting — rather than by discussion. This is where the therapy diverges most from talking approaches, and it is more confronting than it sounds.
Strengthening the mode that can hold the others: soothing the abandoned child, setting limits on the angry one, refusing the punitive one. The aim is not eliminating modes but having something in charge of them.
Including the ones about whether the experiential parts are for you.
No. Chapter 20 names it as an evidence-based option. This page is general reference and nothing here is drawn from the book.
Longer than most. Trials have run one to three years, often twice-weekly early on. It is the biggest time commitment of the main approaches, which is both its reputation and its evidence.
You speak as one mode from one chair and respond from another. It feels absurd for the first two minutes and then frequently does not — people commonly report reaching material that talking about it never got near.
It is the most debated part, and it is bounded — no contact outside agreed limits, no dual relationship, and it is a technique rather than a friendship. If it sounds uncomfortable, that is worth raising in an assessment.
DBT if the urgent need is behavioural control and skills. Schema if skills are broadly holding and what remains is a set of beliefs about yourself that have not moved. Several people do the second after the first.
It is often chosen for exactly that reason — the experiential techniques bypass the explaining. If you can describe your patterns fluently and nothing changes, that is the classic indication.